As a writer and poet, I deal with using words to construct the ‘perfect story’. I use sentences to frame a crucial scene with the protagonist in the tale determining his survival or death. The trick of the trade, as it’s been often said.
Words also affect us in multiple ways. The addition or subtraction of one in a sentence even determined the fate of mankind:
“ye shall surely die” or “ye shall
not surely die”
If you don’t believe that makes a huge difference, consider the fates of Adam and Eve, forever changing the course of eternity and the Creator’s plan. So whether we believe it or not, words not only through our lips, but our written papers, our keyboards, etc, can leave a huge impact on how a generation views an opposing country, opposite genders, even an entire race of people.
Case in point: the infamous Willie Lynch letter.
Recently, I was editing a manuscript for a friend of mine and found the passage where Mr. Lynch ‘allegedly’ mentioned his agenda for controlling slaves. When I first viewed the speech, the words struck a nerve with me. Not only was I offended by what the plan of slave control entailed, I was steamed to believe this ‘gentleman’ actually believed it would last for ‘300 hundred years’. I was so piss…wait.
300 hundred years? Isn’t that a grammatical error?
I admit slave owners may or may not have been fully articulate, but I’m sure they would know 300 and the wording of three hundred years meant the same, right? According to
this historian, this is one of the pieces of evidence the letter read by Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan and resurfaced since the 1990’s, even posted on several select
websites, is a
hoax. Another historian also confirms the letter is not as
authentic as we’re led to believe and in fact, false. Of course, the reaction to the Lynch letter has
inflamed passions beyond belief among our African-American society and online sites
debating the merits of the letter, from debunking the actual person who wrote it to insisting the cruel methods of control he mentioned back then are still in place for us now.
Whether you believe the Lynch letter is for you to decide. What is true is that even if Mr. Lynch never uttered those unfortunate prophetic words, they still haunt us today. For example, twenty years ago there was an anti-violence song by East coast artists warning us about
Self Destruction. The West coast version was
We’re All In The Same Gang. Not too many years after that, the regrettable regression among us occurred as we picked a side, or rather a coast in the
battle of East and West, originally Tupac versus Biggie.
With this conflict, we made Mr. Lynch’s disciples proud. We even restrict ourselves with our self-hate slang words and unconscionable words of just ‘being real’. Real to what? Real to the author of the Lynch letter? Ah, but I digress.
No doubt as a race, Black people have faced a plethora of atrocities by America’s unmoral slave legacy and even the election of a President of a different hue can’t correct them or take them all back. However, it is interesting to see whoever penned those words representing Mr. Lynch has caused the firestorm of debate in the links posted earlier. Yes, we have serious problems among our young and old, but what about finding a solution to those problems? In the world of opinion, there are a thousand voices offering them, but not one definite solution as effective as the derogatory explanations explored in the Lynch letter.
We often find ourselves claiming to be unified, only to lose focus years down the road because we fail to keep in mind our causes, our dreams, our goals as a race are so much bigger than a ‘beef’ of two individuals. However, we wind surrendering to those myths we have about ourselves, such as beliefs the West coast Blacks aren’t as dedicated to the race as those on the East coast, or the internal House vs. Field Negro conflicts within our communities, and other fabrications we use as fact. Five years after the call for unity and stopping the violence among us, during which that time frame an entire city burned, we threw away any long lasting opportunities for achieving accord by allowing media to dictate who we are, where we stand and where we plan to go. What should have been a regular dispute by two musical artists and their companies and kept that way – wound up to a needless and wasteful amount of energy – thereby creating the Lynch letter’s ideals alive and without knowing it at the time, made self-destruction a prophesy instead of a rallying cry bringing us closer.
If anything, the Willie Lynch letter can either bring us together to create a new agenda of unity – and even that can be difficult even if it is achieved because no one will ever be pleased – or it can further cripple us for another plus ‘300 hundred years’ and more by repeating the same things the writer described, consciously or not, with no possible conclusion except to be eternally hampered by the words of one man. Not the words from an upright serpent mind you, but the sting is just as deadly.
One more thing: the second raging controversy is the fact Frederick Douglas addressed Mr. Lynch in one of his essays, but the great orator’s name is often spelled as
Douglass with the extra S. Once again, this proves the power of words spelled or misspelled does have a powerful effect on the message and messenger.
For example, either the person who wrote this is
Charles Chatmon or
Charles Chatman. Click on both links for the example.
Take care.